A Pigovian tax is a tax applied to market activities that cause negative effects on people who are not part of the transaction.
A typical example of a Pigovian tax is a carbon tax, which aims to reduce pollution from gasoline use. Another example is a tobacco tax, designed to help cover the costs that tobacco use places on public healthcare.
Pigovian taxes are named after Arthur Pigou, an English economist who played a key role in developing the theory of externalities. He also highlighted the relationship between consumption, employment, and price, which is referred to as the Pigou effect.
Learn more about Pigovian Tax
A Pigovian tax aims to reduce negative externalities, which are actions that harm others and society. Pigou argued that these externalities disrupt market balance because producers often ignore some production costs. He proposed that imposing taxes equal to these external costs could fix this issue. Ideally, this tax would also motivate producers to lessen the negative impacts they create.
Negative externalities aren’t always “bad.” They happen when a business or individual doesn’t take into account all the costs of their actions. As a result, society and the environment may have to deal with those extra costs.
A typical example of a Pigovian tax is a tax on pollution. When a factory pollutes, it creates a negative externality because others suffer from the production costs. These costs can show up as polluted land, damaged wetlands and streams, or health problems. The polluter only thinks about their own costs and ignores the costs to others.
When Pigou included external costs to society, the economy experienced deadweight loss due to pollution exceeding the “socially optimal” level. He thought the government should step in to fix negative externalities, viewing them as a market failure. His solution was to use taxation to address this issue.
Conclusion
Pigovian taxes are not well-known to many, except for professional economists, but they are commonly applied to goods like gasoline, tobacco, and sugar. Some people question how effective these taxes are, pointing out that they can unfairly affect lower-income groups.
Pigovian taxes are different from Pigovian subsidies. While Pigovian taxes are meant to reduce negative impacts on society, Pigovian subsidies are government funds that promote activities with positive effects that others cannot pay for. A good example of a Pigovian subsidy is funding for public education.